HeadtoHeadFootball -
  • Home
  • NFL
  • NFL STANDINGS
  • STATISTICS
  • Soccer
  • Place Bet
  • Contact Us
HeadtoHeadFootball -
Home
NFL
NFL STANDINGS
STATISTICS
Soccer
Place Bet
Contact Us
  • Home
  • NFL
  • NFL STANDINGS
  • STATISTICS
  • Soccer
  • Place Bet
  • Contact Us
NFL

Jets' Gase: Playcalling now 'a collaborative effort'

New York Jets coach Adam Gase, who presides over the worst offense in the NFL, doesn’t want to say who’s calling the plays because he believes it puts his team at “a competitive disadvantage.”

Gase wants to keep opponents guessing, the same opponents who have held the Jets to a league-low 14 points per game.

“It’s a collaborative effort,” Gase said Monday, one day after insisting offensive coordinator Dowell Loggains has been calling the majority of the plays in recent weeks even though visual evidence indicated otherwise on Sunday.

1 Related

This shouldn’t be a big deal, but everything gets blown up with an 0-11 team that struggles to score points. It has turned into a shell game, with observers trying to figure out who is calling plays on the sideline. It’s almost laughable, as the Jets are ranked last in several offensive categories.

In Week 7, Gase — the playcaller through most of his coaching career — announced he was handing the job to Loggains. Two weeks ago, Gase was actively involved in the process, but he claimed he simply was relaying Loggains’ calls to the quarterback.

Before Sunday’s 20-3 loss to the Miami Dolphins, ESPN’s Chris Mortensen reported that Gase would return to being the primary playcaller. That appeared to be the case during the game, as Gase held the play sheet and communicated with quarterback Sam Darnold. Meanwhile, Loggains was off to the side, holding a small piece of paper and occasionally chatting with other assistants as plays were called. Afterward, Gase explained that, yes, he did call some plays, but only in specific situations — namely third downs and two-minute offense.

On Monday, Gase didn’t want to get into specifics, explaining why he considers it sensitive information. He said opposing coaches can figure out the play based on which coach is making the call.

“For us, to say like who’s calling what, when, what situation and those things, it’s a competitive disadvantage, really, at the end of the day,” he said.

“You don’t want [opponents] to know, is this guy calling runs? Is he calling passes? Is he calling play-actions? Is he calling empties? Is he calling dropbacks? Who has third down and who has red zone? We’d like to do it without having to make it public knowledge.

“The last three weeks, it’s been a collaborative effort throughout the game.”

Soccer

Robertson: VAR making people lose love for football

Liverpool left-back Andy Robertson says VAR is diluting the enjoyment of football and, if the technology can’t help officials be consistent with their decisions, he’d rather have it abolished altogether.

“I used to love going to games and just being in that moment of being able to celebrate a goal. That is being taken out of the game a wee bit,” Robertson said, according to The Guardian’s Andy Hunter. “Now you are waiting two or three minutes to see if a goal is onside or offside and for me, if it is that tight, then leave it to whatever decision was originally made.”

Robertson was involved in a VAR-related controversy in added time of Saturday’s trip to Brighton & Hove Albion. Referee Stuart Attwell was instructed to consult the pitchside monitor to check an incident between Robertson and Danny Welbeck and subsequently determined the Liverpool player had kicked the Brighton striker’s boot.

The awarding of the penalty allowed Pascal Gross to salvage a late draw for the home team and led Robertson’s teammate James Milner to question VAR’s influence over matches.

It’s “clear and obvious” we need a serious discussion about VAR. Sure I’m not alone in feeling like they are falling out of love with the game in its current state. pic.twitter.com/5FGgLtqbHs

— James Milner (@JamesMilner) November 28, 2020

Robertson is sure Milner’s opinion is shared widely throughout football.

“A lot of people I have spoken to are not enjoying football as much as they once did because it is constantly in review, constantly on a screen, and you are still not getting the consistency we are looking for,” Robertson said. “I agree with Milly. A lot of footballers and a lot of fans would agree with him, too.

“Football is a great game that we fell in love with, and are still in love with, and it is important we don’t lose that.”

Well that’s pretty emphatic. In a poll of 32,473 people, a massive 86 per cent said football was better without VAR.
I agree entirely. I was a sceptic and the reality is worse than I expected. They promised “minimum intervention for maximum benefit.” Often feels like the reverse pic.twitter.com/V9c8NUfzCZ

— Oliver Kay (@OliverKay) November 29, 2020

In addition to the technology dampening emotions, Robertson said similar incidents are being dealt with differently despite the extra time being taken to make decisions. He compared his challenge on Welbeck to tackles on Manchester United’s Marcus Rashford and Wolverhampton Wanderers’ Adama Traore during Sunday’s slate.

“We are just looking for consistency. We believed we would be getting that with VAR and we are not getting it,” he stated. “If we are still discussing referees’ decisions after VAR then I would much rather leave it up to the referee’s naked eye.

“It is much easier to accept mistakes made with the naked eye than when there is so much technology around.”

“If you think about it, I've never held a job in my life. I went from being an NFL player to a coach to a broadcaster. I haven't worked a day in my life.”
-John Madden


© 2020 Copyright . All rights reserved | Terms & Conditions | Privacy policy