Cleveland Browns owner Jimmy Haslam was among those viewing as Sam Darnold was slinging in the rain Wednesday at USC.

Haslam was one member of a large contingent present to evaluate the quarterback the Browns are pondering taking with the first overall pick in the NFL draft. In an unusual twist, Darnold chose to keep throwing after a heavy rain started a few minutes into his workout. He received generally favorable reviews from analysts for his footwork, arm strength and accuracy.

Those Browns in attendance for the workout included Haslam, general manager John Dorsey, coach Hue Jackson, offensive coordinator Todd Haley and quarterbacks coach Ken Zampese. Haslam sat with Darnold’s parents during part of the workout. On Tuesday night, the Browns took Darnold out to dinner. Haslam was not present to scout Darnold, but more to get to know him with the rest of the Browns staff.

“He’s a great guy,” Darnold said of Haslam on the NFL Network. “That whole staff is awesome. I was able to meet with the Giants as well [on Monday]. Just meeting with both of those organizations, like I said before, those people are at the top of the world right now and I’m trying to impress them but at the same time be myself. So there is a fine line between that, and I just tried to find that and do my best.”

When: April 26-28
Where: Arlington, Texas
NFL draft coverage » | Full order: 1-256 »

Darnold said during an interview with ESPN that he’s eager to go to a team that wants him. He is well aware that the Browns traded for Tyrod Taylor to be the team’s starting quarterback.

Give Barcelona an inch, and the five-time European champion will take a mile.

Few sides will understand that better than Chelsea, who on Wednesday slumped out of the Champions League last-16 stage courtesy of a 3-0 second-leg defeat at the Camp Nou.

Lionel Messi gave the host a third-minute lead, and instead of withdrawing into its habitual defensive shell, Chelsea was on the front foot. Eden Hazard, Willian, and Olivier Giroud were the principal parts of an attack probing Barcelona’s backline in search of an equaliser, and the Blues appeared the more likely of the two sides to score next.

And then, for the umpteenth time in a celebrated career, Messi happened.

The magical Argentine found a surging Ousmane Dembele, whose first goal for the Catalan giant doubled its lead in the 20th minute, giving Barcelona a 3-1 advantage on aggregate.

Same story, different half, as Chelsea showed attacking intent after the break only for Barcelona to take full advantage of the littlest opportunities. Cesar Azpilicueta played an uncharacteristically poor pass under pressure from Andre Gomes that Jordi Alba intercepted and found Messi, who like Dembele’s goal, found the back of the net with an effort that Thibaut Courtois will regret. It meant 3-0 to Barcelona, 4-1 on aggregate, tie done.

It was Messi’s 100th Champions League goal in just 123 appearances, joining Cristiano Ronaldo as the only players to bag a century of tallies on the continent.

That’s now a record 24 victories against English opponents in Europe’s top-tier tournament, and the 11th season on the trot where Barcelona has made the last eight.

Chelsea will feel like it deserved better, especially after Willian gave the west London lot a surprise lead in the first leg at Stamford Bridge only for Messi to level matters. For a team that has been known to fancy a false nine and a compact midfield, Chelsea was expansive at the Camp Nou, and could have drawn a penalty in the second half when wing-back Marcos Alonso was brought down in the penalty area by Gerard Pique.

It wasn’t to be, nor was progression to the last eight for the first time since 2013-14. Such is the plight of a side faced with the unenviable task of beating Barcelona on club football’s biggest stage.

Barcelona will now await Friday’s draw, with Ernesto Valverde’s lot set to face one of Real Madrid, Sevilla, Liverpool, Manchester City, Juventus, Roma, or Bayern Munich.

SANTA CLARA, Calif. — Richard Sherman, dressed in a bright red tailor-made suit for his first meeting with the Bay Area media Tuesday, made it clear how he feels about the negative assessments of his deal with the San Francisco 49ers and why he valued the chance to negotiate it.

“It was really important to me,” said Sherman, who served as his own agent. “I think that a lot of times in our league there are players that have the ability to do that and have the ability to structure their own deals and really take advantage of just being in control of their own destiny.

“There are great agents in our game that take care of our players, make sure our players are ready for life after football, their finances, whatever the case may be. And then there are some agents who negotiate a deal in 2006 and don’t talk to their client again until 2010, and that’s the thing we’re trying to avoid and I’m trying to avoid.

“I didn’t feel like I needed an agent. I felt like I knew contracts well enough and I felt like coming off the Achilles [injury], there’s going to be negotiation points, there’s going to be give and takes on both sides, and I felt comfortable with that.”

In the days since he signed with the 49ers after a tedious, five-hour-plus negotiation with general manager John Lynch and chief strategy officer Paraag Marathe, Sherman has seen and heard plenty about the disapproval of the contract. The three-year deal could be worth up to $39.15 million, though it effectively would only pay him that much money if he returns to his previous All-Pro form after a ruptured right Achilles suffered last season.

Sherman also wrote a piece for The Players’ Tribune on Tuesday that offered further details on the contract in an effort to shed light on some of the points that have been criticized.

• 

  Richard Sherman met the San Francisco media Tuesday and discussed negotiating his own contract, as well as his decision to play for his former rival.

• 

  Guard Jonathan Cooper, who started a career-high 13 games for the Cowboys in 2017, signed a one-year deal with the 49ers on Tuesday.

Reid was the first player to kneel alongside Colin Kaepernick during the national anthem in protest of racial inequality and systemic oppression. Reid took to Twitter last week to offer his opinion on how his protests might be affecting his job search.

Antonio Conte was not talking about Leo Messi, but he might as well have been. “Everyone is good at asking questions,” the Chelsea manager told Corriere della Sera last May. “The phenomenons are those who go out and get.”

He was, in fact, ruminating on life as a manager, and the tricky art of building a team when you do not have direct control of the purse strings. Conte has never made a secret of his frustrations over the thinness of Chelsea’s squad or his lack of control when it comes to transfer policy. Yet, on the night his team was knocked out of the Champions League, his words felt apt in a different context.

Chelsea had asked stern questions of Barcelona over the two legs of this last-16 tie. At Stamford Bridge, Conte’s team stifled Messi and company for 75 minutes, drawing up in tight lines that left no space for the La Liga leaders to play through before countering at pace. But after Willian gave Chelsea a deserved lead, a single sloppy pass from Andreas Christensen gifted Barcelona with an easy equaliser.

At the time, it felt like an injustice: an accident of fate. But by the end of Wednesday’s second leg rout at the Camp Nou, the context had changed.

Messi’s opener might have felt like another cruel twist. There were barely two minutes gone at the Camp Nou when he exchanged passes with Ousmane Dembele and darted into the penalty area down the right. The Frenchman’s return ball was off target, but bounced kindly off Chelsea’s Marcos Alonso and back to Luis Suarez, who found Messi with a fresh through-ball. The Argentinian converted from close range.

Fortunate? Certainly. But how could we ever look upon such incident as an anomaly? Any team can benefit from a deflected pass or lucky bounce, but there might not be another side in the world that exploits such moments as ruthlessly as Barcelona.

The conversion of chances

A whopping 16 teams have averaged more shots per game in this season’s competition than the Catalans. They include such modest outfits as Benfica and Spartak Moscow. But despite taking fewer attempts than either side, Messi and Co. have outscored the pair of them, combined.

In part, that is because Barcelona carves out better chances. Shots can be a misleading statistic, placing desperation blasts from 40 yards on a par with easy tap-ins from close range. It is also true, though, that quality finishing decides games at this level. And Barcelona can boast the very best.

The truth is that Chelsea played well again here. Even after falling behind so early, it continued to take the game to its hosts. Chelsea hit the woodwork twice and had several more worthy opportunities. And yet, it never scored. Barcelona did, extending its lead through Dembele in the 20th minute before Messi made it 3-0 midway through the second-half.

Conte might call it a question of experience, having cited his own team’s lack thereof in this competition during the days leading up to the game. But this was Dembele’s first Champions League appearance for Barcelona and his second season playing in the competition. It was also his first-ever goal for his new club.

He profited from a sensational assist by Messi, with the Argentinian spotting a run that no other person inside the Camp Nou might have seen. It is also true that Conte, so outspoken on the subject of transfers, has never had €147 million to spend on a single player, as Barcelona did on Dembele.

When we reflect on this tie, though, it is hard to escape the conclusion that the difference between the two teams was less wide than the scoreline suggests. What Chelsea was missing, most of all, was a player capable of making its own chances count.

Wasted opportunities

Or would it be more accurate to say that it did have such a player, but simply neglected to use him? Alvaro Morata played 30 minutes out of 180, coming off the bench late in each leg. Could he have been the man to make Chelsea’s chances count? Recent performances suggest not, yet he has produced on big Champions League nights before now, back in his days at Juventus.

More pointedly, Chelsea’s board might ask how a player whom it spent more than €60 million to acquire, and who had scored seven goals already by the end of September, has fallen into such a rut. Conte’s recent remark that the player had sat on the bench in Madrid and Turin, as well, was never going to go down well.

The expectation is that Chelsea will part ways with the Italian manager in the summer – if not before. That is how things go under Roman Abramovich, who has sacked eight managers (not counting the caretakers) since buying the club in 2003. Conte’s fractious relationship with the board would likely have precluded a long tenure even with results better than he has achieved this season.

Chelsea would be naive to imagine that changing the man in the dugout will be enough to change the outcome on nights such as this. Conte made mistakes, but his team played Barcelona well for most of this tie. What they lacked were goals. It takes more than a manager to get those.

(Photos courtesy: Getty Images)