HeadtoHeadFootball -
  • Home
  • NFL
  • NFL STANDINGS
  • STATISTICS
  • Soccer
  • Place Bet
  • Contact Us
HeadtoHeadFootball -
Home
NFL
NFL STANDINGS
STATISTICS
Soccer
Place Bet
Contact Us
  • Home
  • NFL
  • NFL STANDINGS
  • STATISTICS
  • Soccer
  • Place Bet
  • Contact Us
NFL

Moubarak Djeri's journey to Cardinals spans three continents

TEMPE, Ariz. — Four years ago, when Moubarak Djeri was starting his career with the Cologne Crocodiles of the German Football League, he first brought up the idea of playing in the NFL with coach Patrick Kopper.

Kopper was supportive, but warned the then-18-year-old that he needed to be realistic. It was going to be hard. NFL players were bigger, faster and stronger, and to compete with them, Djeri would have to work out “like a beast.”

But Kopper didn’t try to dissuade Djeri from chasing his dream.

“I know they are big, but why not?” Djeri remembered saying then. “Why not to try? Why say right now, no and all this stuff. Why not to try?”

Djeri’s pursuit of the NFL, with a wide-eyed naiveté, ultimately served him well. In March, he went from playing for free with the Crocodiles to a tryout and, ultimately, a contract with the Arizona Cardinals.

Crocodiles offensive coordinator David Odenthal, a native German who grew up playing for the club before receiving a scholarship to play at the University of Toledo and who spent time in two NFL camps before playing in NFL Europe, loved Djeri’s optimism.

Before Moubarak Djeri got his dream tryout with the Cardinals, he was playing for free in the German Football League. Courtesy of the Arizona Cardinals

“I like and liked the way he thinks about it,” Odenthal said. “He doesn’t know or doesn’t care about all the things that go on about playing in the NFL. He didn’t know how hard it actually is and that makes him so special. I know he meant it when he said it.”

Odenthal and other Crocodiles coaches started preparing Djeri for the long road ahead of him. They peppered him with stories of going through two-a-days in NFL Europe followed by meetings all night. All it did was motivate Djeri.

“I said, ‘OK, if they both have to work that hard to play in the NFL Europe, I have to work more to be in the NFL,'” Djeri said. “And I started working out every day like for four, five hours.”

Two years ago, Odenthal told Djeri that if he continued to work hard, he would help him get to America to play football. Odenthal had an in. He not only played college football and in NFL Europe, but he had two connections to the Cardinals. He had been scouted by Arizona’s current general manager, Steve Keim, while at Toledo, and he had developed a relationship with Ryan Gold, a Cardinals scout, when Gold was an assistant coach at the University of Massachusetts. Gold had recruited two of Odenthal’s offensive linemen.

But, two years later, Djeri was still waiting for a bite from the NFL.

In the meantime, teams around Europe had started recruiting him. And they were able to offer him something the Crocodiles couldn’t: money. They saw the potential in Djeri, a 6-foot-4, 268-pound player who showed burst off the edge and enough speed to get into backfields as well as track down receivers past the line of scrimmage.

The allure of getting paid for the first time in his football career at age 22, four years in, was tempting.

“With this payment, I can help my family,” Djeri told ESPN.

What Djeri didn’t know was Gold had reached out to Odenthal in September to see if he had any interesting prospects. Odenthal mentioned Djeri.

Djeri’s film was passed around the Cardinals’ scouting department and, Gold said, the team thought there was an upside.

Gold liked Djeri’s foot speed, natural bend and power. But what was most enticing to the Cardinals was that since Djeri hadn’t gone to college, he was, in the NFL’s eyes, a free agent and not a draft-eligible prospect. So if the Cardinals were interested in signing him, they could bring him in for a tryout and not risk losing him in the draft.

And that’s what they did.

***

When Moubarak Djeri first began playing football in Germany, he had to do so covertly because his mother had forbidden him from playing. She was worried he would get hurt. “Like moms are,” Djeri said. Courtesy of the Arizona Cardinals

Djeri was 6 years old and living in Togo, a small West African country, when he saw American football on TV for the first time.

He instantly fell in love.

Like any kid enthralled with a new sport, he went straight to his mother and asked to play. He doesn’t think she knew what the sport was at the time, but she still gave him a resounding “no.” Her reasons for not letting him play fell in line with those of many American parents today: “You’re going to get hurt,” she told him.

“Like moms are,” Djeri said.

For the next five years, Djeri continued to watch American football on TV with a child’s wonderment.

• After tumultuous year, Zeke to get to work
• Mariota: Healthy, braceless, feeling free
• Gruesome injury didn’t stop Eagles’ Sweat
• Steelers bet big on James Conner

Then Djeri — 11 at the time — his mother and his four siblings moved to Germany to reunite with his father, whom Djeri said he hadn’t really know. He asked to play football again after they moved, but this time both parents nixed the idea, and he started playing the other football — soccer. Djeri stuck with the sport for seven years, but he started to outgrow the other kids on the pitch. He was too physical, and all that contact quickly led to penalty cards, so his coaches put him in net. He flourished as a goalkeeper, leading his team to a league championship.

But Djeri wasn’t satisfied. European football wasn’t cutting it. He still wanted to play the football he had grown up watching on TV.

So he did what any younger sibling would do: He went to his older brother to plead his case to play American football. Djeri’s brother, six years his elder, told him he would cover for Djeri with their parents if Djeri wanted to try.

Djeri, 18 at the time, had gotten his chance, but he would have to play covertly. And he did, until one day his mother saw him with his pads. She asked what they were, and Djeri confessed to playing football behind her back. She wasn’t pleased. Djeri bargained with her. He had a game on Sunday that week, he told her, and he wanted her to come to it. If she still didn’t like that he was playing, he’d quit. If she liked it, he’d continue.

She went.

And she never stopped going to a home game.

“She’s come to support me and watch me. That’s the big motivation I had,” Djeri said. “My family supports me, too. My big brother supports me in what I do, but right now my mom’s coming, and after that my dad.

“My mom loved that I played football.”

***

Djeri’s tryout with the Cardinals lasted 15 minutes.

Cardinals defensive-line coach Don Johnson put Djeri through a set of drills that tested his mental and physical mettle. Arizona wanted to know how Djeri could handle a hard workout and what kind of shape he was in.

“I was so nervous,” Djeri said. “In the tryout, I couldn’t breathe.”

He took a few big deep breaths, and then the tryout began. At one point, Djeri felt like he was blacking out, but refused to stop. He wanted to show the Cardinals how badly he wanted to play in the NFL.

When it was over, Djeri started crying.

“I said, ‘Coach, I’m sorry I couldn’t make it better.’ He said, ‘No, take a shower. We’re going to talk after,'” Djeri remembered. “I was in the locker room and I started crying. I said, ‘Damn, I missed it.’ After that, coach came in. He said, ‘Hey, you made it well. We like your get-off.’ I thought I didn’t make it good.

“He said, ‘We would like to make you an Arizona Cardinal.’ I was like, ‘OK, stop crying, stop crying.’”

The Cardinals signed Djeri to a three-year deal. If he makes the team, he’ll make $480,000 this year, $570,000 next year and $660,000 in 2020.

When Odenthal found out Djeri had been signed, he got goosebumps and tears filled his eyes.

“From Day 1, I knew he will be something special,” Kopper said. “He is absolutely fearless and gives everything he has on every single down. He loves the game from the bottom of his heart.”

Djeri’s journey to the NFL is just beginning. But the 22-year-old is used to starting from scratch and fighting the odds. Cardinals coach Steve Wilks called him a project. But Djeri has been making strides. After a few weeks on the field, Djeri said the biggest adjustment has been the tempo. That’s to be expected for someone who’s not just new to the NFL but new to the American style of football.

Djeri isn’t satisfied with getting a tryout or getting signed. He wants to make the Cardinals’ 53-man roster.

“I say I have to think that I can make it,” Djeri said. “If I think I couldn’t make it then I’m never going to make it. If I think I’m going to make it, I’m going to make it or not.

“I don’t want to say it’s easy because it’s a competition. I’m hoping and I try my best to make the team, and that’s why I’m here. At the end of the offseason program, I want to be on the field and I want to play.”

Gold likes what he’s seen from Djeri, but there’s work to be done.

“I think he’s going to just have to keep getting better,” Gold said of Djeri making the team. “He’s going to have good days and bad days — learn from the bad and don’t get too excited about the good ones.”

When Djeri got the contract offer from the Cardinals in March, he said he felt like a weight was lifted off of him. It has been 16 years since he first saw a football game, 11 years since he asked to play in Germany and four years since his brother covered for him as he began playing.

“I was like, ‘Damn, I made it.'”

NFL

Pot charge dropped against 49ers LB Foster

A misdemeanor marijuana charge against San Francisco 49ers linebacker Reuben Foster in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, was dismissed Friday afternoon.

The Tuscaloosa County District Court confirmed Friday that the second-degree charge, which stemmed from a Jan. 12 arrest, had been dismissed on the condition that Foster pay court costs, which amount to a $100 bail bond fee.

The Tuscaloosa District Attorney’s office told ESPN that Foster also completed a court-ordered diversion program, which included taking substance-abuse classes, and had several months of clean drug screen results.

Reuben Foster had more charges against him dropped Friday, as a marijuana case in Alabama was dismissed. AP Photo/Jeff Chiu

The dropped marijuana charge comes two days after Foster had two felony charges related to domestic violence against him dismissed by Santa Clara County (California) Judge Nona L. Klippen. Foster rejoined the 49ers on Thursday afternoon as they held their third organized team activity.

Foster still faces a misdemeanor charge in California for possession of an assault rifle, a charge that was initially tied to the Feb. 11 incident at his home in Los Gatos. While Klippen dismissed the charges related to domestic violence, she reduced the gun charge from a felony to a misdemeanor.

A pretrial hearing for that charge has been set for June 6 at noon ET. Foster legally purchased that gun in Alabama, and because it does not violate any federal laws, Klippen reduced the charge to a misdemeanor.

Depending on what becomes of that charge, Foster could still face punishment from the NFL. The league has repeatedly said it is monitoring the situation and will continue to review all new developments.

NFL

Sources: Giants let go equipment employees

11:15 PM ET

  • Jordan Raanan

  • Darren Rovell

    Close

    ESPN Senior Writer
    • ESPN.com’s sports business reporter since 2012; previously at ESPN from 2000-06
    • Appears on SportsCenter, ESPN Radio, ESPN.com and with ABC News
    • Formerly worked as analyst at CNBC

The New York Giants have shaken up their equipment room less than two weeks after settling with three sports memorabilia collectors who accused quarterback Eli Manning and several members of the organization of providing bogus “game-worn” equipment that was sold to unsuspecting fans.

Longtime team employees Edward and Joseph Skiba and Ed Wagner Jr. were let go, multiple sources told ESPN. Joseph Skiba was the team’s equipment director. Edward Skiba, his brother, was the assistant equipment manager. Wagner was the equipment/locker room manager. He had worked for the Giants his entire adult life, according to a 1999 story by The New York Times. His father also was an equipment manager for the team.

The Giants declined to comment on the shakeup.

Joseph Skiba, who was a defendant in the original lawsuit, was asked by Manning in an email to get “2 helmets that can pass as game used.” Skiba later testified that he gave Manning two non-game-used helmets in that instance. The point of contention became whether helmets that were bought by collectors in other years were game used or not.

Skiba was not liable in the civil suit that was settled May 14, according to the judge’s summary judgment.

Skiba, who was accused of making the fake Manning helmets that were sold to collectors by Steiner Sports (the company with which Manning is under contract to provide game-worn jerseys and helmets for sale), had almost all the claims against him dismissed. The judge agreed with his counsel’s arguments that he never profited from the exchange of helmets, nor did he ever directly represent the items as game-used to consumers.

However, owner John Mara said in a deposition that he considered what Skiba did stealing from the team. The Giants did not represent the Skibas in the case, which stretched five years.

In one of the court filings, Manning’s lawyer accused memorabilia collector Eric Inselberg of being “engaged in a decades-long memorabilia scheme” in which he obtained, without permission, game-used Giants equipment, including Manning’s, from the Skibas as well as a local dry cleaner.

Wagner also was listed in the original plaintiff’s complaint, although he was eventually cleared of any liability in the civil case against Manning, the Giants and Steiner Sports.

The Giants are generally considered one of the more stable franchises, and turnover in the equipment room is rare. The Skibas had been with the organization since they were college students.

NFL

Here's what the national anthem policy actually means

5:00 PM ET

  • Kevin SeifertNFL Nation

    Close

    • ESPN.com national NFL writer
    • ESPN.com NFC North reporter, 2008-2013
    • Covered Vikings for Minneapolis Star Tribune, 1999-2008

ATLANTA — NFL owners have approved a policy that could end player protests during the national anthem. Will it work? Are owners truly united in the effort? And is it more complicated than it needed to be?

Let’s take a closer look at all the lingering questions.


Give it to me in a nutshell. What’s the new policy?

Any team personnel, including players, must “stand and show respect for the flag and the anthem” if they’re on the field at that time, according to the policy statement. It replaces a previous policy that said players “should” stand but did not make it required.

Players are required to stand if they are on the field during the national anthem. Full story »

• Answering the biggest questions »
• Players, coaches and owners react »
• Jets won’t prohibit kneeling »
• 49ers owner abstains from vote »

What does “on the field at that time” mean?

Players who don’t want to stand have the option to go to the locker room during the anthem performance. There will be no discipline for doing so.

“We’re not forcing anyone to stand that doesn’t feel that’s within the way they feel about the particular subjects,” Pittsburgh Steelers owner Art Rooney II said. “But those that are on the field are going to be asked to stand.”

Does that mean any player in the locker room during the anthem will be assumed to be in silent protest?

That’s where things start to get complicated. Players sometimes go in for last-second treatment or (emergency) bathroom breaks. They now might have to clarify why they were not on the field.

How exactly will the NFL define “showing respect” for players who are on the field for the anthem?

It’s a fair question given the frequency of disputes between players and the league on policy interpretations. What’s clear is that the anthem policy extends beyond kneeling or sitting. Linking arms and raising fists, for example, are also expected to be prohibited.

Owners queried on this issue Wednesday said, in essence, that they’ll know it when they see it.

“We didn’t define exactly what they have to be doing to be out there,” Rooney said, “but I think everyone understands what it means to be respectful toward the anthem.”

This is actually a quite reasonable point. If the point of protest is to draw attention, the protest itself can’t be subtle. It’s difficult to imagine a scenario in which a player is perceived to have protested when in fact he intended no such thing.

Raised fists and linked arms are expected to be prohibited under the league’s new policy. Rich Schultz/Getty Images

What’s to stop a player from protesting on the field?

Again, it’s complicated. Some owners wanted to avoid a direct threat of discipline for protesting. In the end, the league can only fine the team — not the player himself — for a protest. In turn, it is up to the individual team to develop its own policy for disciplining players who protest during the anthem.

Any team punishment of a player must be in accordance with the collective bargaining agreement. Most likely, discipline for protesting would fall under “conduct detrimental to the team.” According to the CBA, the maximum punishment for that violation is one week’s salary and/or a four-week unpaid suspension.

How much could the league fine the teams?

The league hasn’t said, and it’s an important detail. If the fine is relatively small, a sympathetic owner could pay the league and then decline to discipline the player.

So, in that scenario, a player could protest and not face discipline?

Correct.

Will that happen? Is there really an owner who would endorse a protest during the anthem, despite these efforts?

Perhaps. New York Jets owner Christopher Johnson said that he won’t discourage players from kneeling, even if it results in the club being fined by the NFL.

“Our focus is not on imposing any club rules, fines or restrictions,” Johnson said in a statement.

Johnson’s comments help illustrate the division among owners. So does the decision of San Francisco 49ers owner Jed York, who abstained entirely from the vote. York didn’t provide many details to explain his decision, other than to say he wanted to focus on pursuing progress.

Why were owners so divided?

Much like the country at large, they come from various backgrounds and political tilts. Some, including the Dallas Cowboys’ Jerry Jones, were genuinely aghast at players protesting during the anthem. Some feared for the business. Others, such as Johnson, did not want to drive further divisions with players.

The final policy was a tortured threading of the needle that reflected multiple viewpoints. Here’s one example of the knots the owners tied themselves into: Some rejected a proposal to clear the field of all team personnel before the anthem, long considered the cleanest and easiest fix, because they thought it would be interpreted as a mass protest and/or disrespectful to the flag.

Are owners really concerned about patriotism? Or just the appearance of it?

Can the answer be both? All owners prefer that players stand during the anthem, but their efforts to address it didn’t start until President Donald Trump began criticizing the protests last fall. To complete the circle, Vice President Mike Pence tweeted a screenshot of a news story on the policy Wednesday and included the hashtag “#winning.”

You’ve come all this way and barely addressed the players’ viewpoint!

Sorry, but that mirrors the NFL’s approach throughout the process. Owners worked closely with a group of players to create an $89 million social justice platform, one designed to address some of the issues players were protesting. But the league did not consult with the NFL Players Association during the development of the anthem policy.

Why not?

Because they didn’t have to and didn’t want to. The policy is a part of the game operations manual, not the CBA, and isn’t subject to collective bargaining. Owners wanted to work with players on the core issues at the root of the protests. But one way to view the policy is an attempt to wrest control of an issue owners felt was threatening their bottom line.

What is the NFLPA saying?

The union will do what it should: review the rule and then protect players by challenging any attempts — intentional or otherwise — to skirt the CBA.

Executive director DeMaurice Smith leaned in hard in a statement posted to Twitter, saying that “management has chosen to squash the same freedom of speech that protects someone who wants to salute the flag in an effort to prevent someone who does not wish to do so.” That claim seems to ignore the players’ option to go into the locker room, but it reflects the frustrated opposition of a group excluded from the process.

pic.twitter.com/3FvuGyy4tA

— NFLPA (@NFLPA) May 23, 2018

What else could go wrong?

The league must be prepared to deal with owners who apply implicit or overt pressure on players to take the field, stand for the anthem and forgo a trip to the locker room. It would be a violation of the rule but difficult to adjudicate outside of the CBA. This could be especially relevant if enough players remain in the locker room to make it a weekly issue.

What’s next?

The policy allows each club to “develop its own work rules, consistent with the above principles, regarding its personnel who do not stand and show respect for the flag and the anthem.” In other words, each team can decide how (or if) it wants to discipline players or other employees who protest during the anthem. The presumed deadline is the first week of the preseason.

Page 239 of 404« First...102030«238239240241»250260270...Last »

“If you think about it, I've never held a job in my life. I went from being an NFL player to a coach to a broadcaster. I haven't worked a day in my life.”
-John Madden


© 2020 Copyright . All rights reserved | Terms & Conditions | Privacy policy