HeadtoHeadFootball -
  • Home
  • NFL
  • NFL STANDINGS
  • STATISTICS
  • Soccer
  • Place Bet
  • Contact Us
HeadtoHeadFootball -
Home
NFL
NFL STANDINGS
STATISTICS
Soccer
Place Bet
Contact Us
  • Home
  • NFL
  • NFL STANDINGS
  • STATISTICS
  • Soccer
  • Place Bet
  • Contact Us
NFL

Process needs fixing, but Elliott's suspension should stand

The federal judge in the Ezekiel Elliott case just Richard Berman-ed the NFL. You remember Berman, right? He was the U.S. District Court judge who temporarily sucked the air out of Deflategate, setting Tom Brady free to play the 2015 season while taking a sledgehammer to Roger Goodell’s union-bargained system of justice.

The judge this time around, U.S. District Judge Amos Mazzant might never again have to pay for lunch in Dallas (Berman famously won a lifetime supply of free Dunkin’ Donuts coffee in Maine) if Elliott plays the full season and helps the Cowboys win the Super Bowl for the first time in 22 years. Mazzant blasted the league by granting Elliott and the NFL Players Association a temporary restraining order and halting the implementation of the running back’s six-game suspension for allegedly assaulting a former girlfriend, ruling that the NFL was playing this game on a field tilted dramatically in its favor.

“Fundamental unfairness,” the judge wrote, “is present throughout the entire arbitration process. … The NFLPA was not given the opportunity to discharge its burden to show that Goodell’s decision was arbitrary and capricious. At every turn, Elliott and the NFLPA were denied the evidence or witnesses needed to meet their burden. Fundamental unfairness infected this case from the beginning, eventually killing any possibility that justice would be served. Accordingly, the Court finds that the NFLPA demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.”

Ouch.

On one hand, Mazzant is right: This particular NFL process is broken. A system that assigns Goodell the roles of prosecutor, judge and jury just doesn’t work, and the league office and owners have to work with the players to ultimately settle on an independent overlord of discipline. But on the other hand, the union, the Cowboys and Jerry Jones — once Greg Hardy’s chief enabler — shouldn’t be doing any end zone dances over this courtroom victory.

Elliott had earned his punishment, and after committing so many unforced errors while confronting (or not confronting) domestic violence, the league did the right thing in sending a message to players that one term of employment, above all, must be understood:

If you assault a woman, your career will be dramatically altered in a negative way.

Josh Brown, the former Giants kicker, just got six games added to the one game he’d already served for allegedly abusing his wife. Perhaps the NFL blitzed Brown before this latest Elliott ruling to get a victory on the board, or to prove it treats players of all skill levels, races and team affiliations the same when it comes to domestic violence. Perhaps not.

Either way, let us remember the league’s letter to Elliott informing him of the suspension said it found “substantial and persuasive evidence” that the 6-foot, 225-pound running back engaged in violence against the 5-5, 120-pound Tiffany Thompson “on multiple occasions.” Though Robert Tobias, principal assistant city attorney in Columbus, Ohio, said criminal charges were never filed against Elliott because of a lack of sufficient corroborating evidence, he did tell the league: “We never concluded that she was lying to us. We didn’t think that she was lying to us. … We generally believed her for all of the incidents.”

Tobias said Thompson’s injuries were “consistent with what she said had happened. … I feel like something definitely happened here.”

Elliott has consistently denied ever striking, choking or pushing Thompson, and he claims that she told him, “You are a black, male athlete. I’m a white girl. They are not going to believe you.” Elliott also claimed that Thompson fabricated the abuse claims and threatened to ruin his life when their relationship unraveled. One of Elliott’s attorneys, Jeffrey Kessler, challenged her credibility by noting the league suspended his client based on three of the five incidents of abuse she cited over a week in July of last year.

Roger Goodell and the NFL have made mistakes in the past, but they are right to punish in this case. AP Photo/Steven Senne

“Why is that?” Kessler asked during the running back’s appeal hearing. “What you’re going to find is that the league itself did not believe her for two out of the five incidents the same week. Well, if she was lying about two out of the five incidents, that certainly doesn’t help the determination with respect to the three incidents they went forward with.”

Kia Roberts, the NFL’s director of investigations, was the league official who interviewed Thompson. Roberts also had concerns about Thompson’s credibility — the league found texts between Thompson and a friend in which they discussed the potential sale of sex tapes Thompson had of herself and Elliott and the possibility of extorting money from him — and would have advised against disciplining Elliott. Goodell never spoke directly with Roberts and instead relied on his senior VP/special counsel for investigations, Lisa Friel, and his circle of outside advisers. He then made his decision, opening the door for the federal judge, Mazzant, to assail the process and grant the restraining order. But it was more a question of process than evidence.

Thompson reminded everyone who has followed this case that there is no such thing as a perfect witness. But that doesn’t mean she wasn’t a victim of domestic violence. It’s still awfully hard to read the NFL’s report and the appeal hearing transcript and come away believing her former boyfriend never assaulted her.

And assaulting a woman even one time is worth six games, and the public shaming that goes along with it.

Elliott compromised his own credibility in this case in March, when he was seen on video at a St. Patrick’s Day parade in Dallas pulling down a woman’s shirt to expose and touch her breast. (He would say in his appeal hearing that the woman later consented to have sex with him, as if that rendered his behavior at the parade acceptable.) For Elliott to act like this, while under league investigation for allegedly assaulting another woman, is to strongly suggest he doesn’t get it, and maybe never will.

But now this great football player gets to play Sunday night’s season opener against the New York Giants — and maybe the rest of the season — for the most recognizable American football team on the planet. It’s yet another legal defeat for the NFL and Goodell. But it’s a defeat of process. It’s not a defeat of intent.

In her original Instagram post — complete with photos showing her bruises — Thompson said the abuse “has been happening to me for months and it finally got out of control to where I was picked up and thrown across the room by my arms. Thrown into walls. Being choked to where I have to gasp for breath. Bruised everywhere, mentally and physical abused.”

After the sickening episodes involving Ray Rice, Hardy and Brown, the league had to make this stand. And now the league has to fight this case to the figurative death in the courts and continue making this necessary point:

If you hit a woman, your NFL career will end up getting seriously hurt.

NFL

All things are possible for the Chiefs after victory over Patriots

FOXBOROUGH, Mass. — The Kansas City Chiefs are out of excuses if they don’t maintain inside position for the AFC’s Super Bowl berth. For a team that for several seasons has been on the cusp but not quite elite, that’s a decidedly comfortable place to be.

The Chiefs took the mantle as AFC favorite from the defending Super Bowl champion New England Patriots by winning at Gillette Stadium 42-27 on Thursday night. The Chiefs accomplished the improbable by getting two elements that seemed most unlikely leading up to the game.

Alex Smith threw for 368 yards with four touchdowns and no picks in the Chiefs’ rout Thursday. Steven Senne/AP Photo

Quarterback Alex Smith outplayed Patriots counterpart Tom Brady in every way, throwing four touchdown passes, including a 75-yarder to Tyreek Hill in the third quarter and a 78-yarder to rookie running back Kareem Hunt early in the fourth.

Smith was 28-of-35 for 368 yards and four touchdowns, without an interception. Brady was only 16-of-36 for 267 yards, without a TD or INT.

The Chiefs also got a big game from Hunt, who became only the third player since 1970 with 150 yards from scrimmage and three touchdowns in his NFL debut, joining Marshall Faulk (1994) and Billy Sims (1980).

The Chiefs made the interesting decision to try to disrupt Brady with coverage rather than pressure. The Chiefs frequently dropped eight players into coverage and rushed Brady with three.


• Statistics
• Scoreboard
• 2017 schedule, results
• Standings

The strategy wasn’t consistently effective, but it allowed the Chiefs to limit the damage the Patriots did with their passing game.

All things seem possible now for the Chiefs after their most impressive victory in four seasons (plus one game) with Andy Reid as their coach. The Chiefs have some wins to be proud of in that time, such as against the Falcons in Atlanta and two victories over the Oakland Raiders.

Thursday night’s win was in a different category. It came at the expense of the defending Super Bowl champions in a building where they rarely lose with Brady as their quarterback.

If the Chiefs can overcome all of that, what’s left on their schedule that can’t they conquer?

NFL

Martellus: I cried after seeing video of Michael

GREEN BAY, Wis. — Martellus Bennett heard from his brother, Michael Bennett, in the immediate aftermath of what happened in Las Vegas on Aug. 27. But when Martellus saw the video of the incident involving his sibling for the first time on Wednesday, he had to excuse himself from a meeting room at Lambeau Field, where he and the Green Bay Packers were preparing for Sunday’s season opener against the Seattle Seahawks.

“I didn’t even know there was a video,” Martellus said. “I had to walk out of meetings because I broke down crying, just thinking about what could have happened, what could have been. It was just so close. You never know these days.”

  • Seahawks defensive end Michael Bennett said he is considering filing a civil rights lawsuit after an incident in Las Vegas last month in which he says police officers pointed guns at him and used excessive force.

  • He’s uncomfortable with the world and wants everyone else to feel that way too.

1 Related

In a 20-minute session with reporters on Wednesday, Martellus spoke at length about Michael, the Seahawks defensive end. By the end, Martellus had tears streaming down his face when he talked about just giving his brother a hug when the two are reunited this weekend before Sunday’s game at Lambeau.

“Sometimes, a hug is the best thing you can give,” Martellus said as his voice cracked. “I mean, I don’t really know, really — you know what I’m saying? I don’t really have the answers. You just think, ‘What if?’ You know? Two seconds this way, two seconds that way, the whole thing is different. So for me, I’ll just be happy to see my brother, because there’s a chance I couldn’t see him.”

Earlier on Wednesday, Michael Bennett posted a social media message about the Las Vegas incident, in which he accused police of using excessive force and drawing a gun on him. He wrote that officers pointed guns at him “for doing nothing more than simply being a black man in the wrong place at the wrong time” and ordered him to lie down on the ground.

A video posted Wednesday by TMZ Sports shows a police officer putting handcuffs on Michael. At one point in the video, Michael is heard yelling to the officer: “I wasn’t doing nothing, man! I was here with my friends. They told us to get out; everybody ran. Can you answer my question, sir?”

Martellus Bennett said he received a call from his brother in the hours shortly following the incident, after the Packers had returned home from a preseason game at Denver. He described Michael as “hysterical” during the phone call and said he just tried to calm him down.

“Michael’s doing well,” Martellus said. “I think the first couple days were really tough. I think he’s doing well. He has a lot of support, a lot of good support, a lot of friends, but he’s doing well.”

Martellus said he supported his brother’s decision to go public with the incident.

“I’m very proud of Michael and the way that he handled it,” Martellus said. “There’s a lot of guys who told him not to say anything. It may be a distraction. You don’t need to say anything. You’re alive, you lived through it, why tell anyone your story? For me, I think that’s the wrong way to go about it. I think his letter, it was eloquent. You had to empathize with the side of the story that he was telling, what happened to him.”

Last month, Martellus offered his support for Michael’s decision not to stand during the national anthem, even though Martellus has not replicated his brother’s actions. Instead, Martellus released his own political cartoon last month as his statement on society and race relations.

Martellus said he does not plan any anthem protest for Week 1.

“I like to speak through my art, my words and things like that,” Martellus said. “I wouldn’t be surprised if I draw another political cartoon or some s—, but other than that, I don’t know right now. I’m more of a spur-of-the-moment type guy, type thing.”

Most of the Bennett family is expected to be in Green Bay this weekend for the Packers-Seahawks game, and Martellus said it’s perfect timing, because though he has spoken to Michael at length following the Las Vegas incident, the brothers haven’t seen each other in person since then.

“Life goes so fast and seasons go so fast,” Martellus said. “You don’t get to spend as much time with family. So, it’s pretty good to have so much family coming to town this weekend, being able to see him and have dinner with him and talk to him and different things like that — and then go out there and try to kick his ass.”

NFL

Elliott's 6-game ban upheld, but OK for Sunday

FRISCO, Texas — Dallas Cowboys running back Ezekiel Elliott is eligible to play in Sunday’s season opener against the New York Giants even though an arbitrator upheld Elliott’s six-game suspension handed down by commissioner Roger Goodell.

In a temporary restraining order hearing in U.S. District Court in Sherman, Texas, on Tuesday, NFL attorneys acknowledged that, because of the timing of Harold Henderson’s decision to uphold Elliott’s suspension for violating the personal conduct policy, Elliott will be able to play in Week 1 against the Giants.

The NFL issued a statement on Twitter explaining Elliott being cleared to play Sunday.

“In the absence of a ruling from Mr. Henderson at the outset of the hearing, the judge indicated his desire to have the appropriate time to consider all legal issues before making a ruling,” the NFL explained. “To that end, the judge asked counsel whether it was prepared to allow Mr. Elliott’s suspension, if upheld, to begin after week one allowing him time to make that ruling. In deference to the judge, NFL counsel agreed that Mr. Elliott would be permitted to play this weekend regardless of the timing of the decision. When the decision was issued, the judge advised that in light of the league’s agreement, he would allow additional filings and make his decision by Friday.”

Elliott’s availability for Week 2 at the Denver Broncos and beyond is in doubt. Judge Amos Mazzant said he will make a decision on Elliott’s temporary restraining order by Friday at 6 p.m. ET.

  • While the Cowboys back will be allowed to play Week 1, he may have to serve a six-game ban afterward including a Week 8 game against Washington.

  • What happens now that an arbitrator has upheld Zeke’s suspension? All your burning questions on the next steps in the process answered here.

1 Related

If the TRO is not granted and Elliott does not take the case further in the legal system, then the first game Elliott would be eligible to play would be Nov. 5 against the Kansas City Chiefs.

Elliott’s attorneys said they intend to take the running back’s case to the federal level if necessary.

“Mr. Elliott is looking forward to having his day in federal court where the playing field will be level and the NFL will have to answer for its unfair and unjust practices,” Elliott’s attorneys said in a statement.

A spokesman for the Cowboys said the team has no comment on Tuesday’s decision.

That Elliott will be available Sunday could be viewed as a minor victory for the running back and the Cowboys. While the Cowboys express support for Elliott’s potential replacements, Darren McFadden, Alfred Morris and Rod Smith, none is as good as Elliott, who led the NFL in rushing with 1,631 yards last year.

The Cowboys were 3.5-point favorites over the Giants at the majority of Las Vegas sportsbooks, prior to Elliott’s being cleared to play in Week 1. The line ticked up to Dallas -4 after the news was announced.

Ezekiel Elliott is eligible to play in Sunday’s season opener, despite his six-game ban being upheld. Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images

Elliott took part in Tuesday’s meetings and walk-through at the Cowboys’ practice facility, The Star, in Frisco, Texas, before heading to Paul Brown District Court, roughly 50 minutes away, in time for the hearing. He is expected to be at the Cowboys’ full-pads practice on Wednesday.

On Aug. 11 the NFL announced a six-game suspension for violating the personal conduct policy, citing “persuasive” evidence Elliott committed physical abuse against Tiffany Thompson, a former girlfriend, at least three times in July 2016.

Despite Elliott’s ability to play Sunday, his attorneys issued a statement decrying Henderson’s decision.

“We are extremely disappointed with Mr. Henderson’s inability to navigate through league politics, and follow the evidence and, most importantly, his [conscience],” Elliott’s attorneys said in a statement.

The statement also contends that Elliott is the “victim of a conspiracy orchestrated by the National Football League and its officers to keep exonerating evidence from the decision-makers, including the advisors and Roger Goodell.”

Elliott had his appeal heard last week in New York with three days of testimony lasting 25 hours from Elliott and multiple experts and witnesses, although Thompson was not allowed to be called. It was revealed during the hearing that the league’s lead investigator, Kia Wright Roberts, was not at the meeting in which Goodell and the four advisors reached the conclusion Elliott needed to be suspended. Roberts was the only NFL employee to interview Thompson, doing so six times, and she recommended Elliott not be disciplined.

That is among the reasons why the NFLPA has gone to court to continue the fight on Elliott’s behalf, believing the process lacks fundamental fairness. The NFL counters that the Deflategate case involving Tom Brady sets precedent that Goodell has the right to make such decisions.

In the conclusion of his decision, Henderson explained that as arbitrator it was his job to evaluate the fairness of the NFL’s process in which it penalized Elliott, not whether or not the punishment was fitting.

“The review is to determine whether the player was afforded adequate notice of his alleged violation, the right to representation, opportunity to present evidence, and a decision which is fair and consistent,” Henderson wrote. “In a case involving violation of a policy, fair and consistent means whether the process and result were in compliance with the terms of that policy. This one is, in every respect.”

Page 278 of 379« First...102030«277278279280»290300310...Last »

“If you think about it, I've never held a job in my life. I went from being an NFL player to a coach to a broadcaster. I haven't worked a day in my life.”
-John Madden


© 2020 Copyright . All rights reserved | Terms & Conditions | Privacy policy